The royal feud between Meghan Markle and her sister-in-law Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, has been the topic of much speculation for many years. The royals are currently in the news regarding an alleged row they had ahead of Meghan and Prince Harry’s split from the royal family. But were the two women always destined to have a tense relationship?
Claims about a royal feud between Meghan and Kate have been dismantled in the upcoming royal biography Finding Freedom.
The book, co-authored by royal experts Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand, explores this idea and debunks rumours about the feud.
Scobie and Durand said: “Meghan would agree with the assessment that the duchesses were not the best of friends.
“Their relationship hadn’t progressed much since she was Harry’s girlfriend.
“Although Meghan might have understood Kate’s wariness to strike up a meaningful friendship, they were still no closer by the time she was a fellow senior working member of the royal family and the wife of William’s brother.”
The pair added the women could not be described as close by any means.
They said: “But they were not at war with each other either.
“The truth was that Meghan and Kate just didn’t know each other that well.”
The royal experts further claimed reports of Kate being reduced to tears after a bridesmaid dress fitting for Princess Charlotte are untrue.
But according to Princess Diana’s astrologer Debbie Frank the women will never particularly get along.
Speaking to Hello! Magazine she said: “One look at Meghan Markle’s Leo birth chart compared to Capricorn Kate’s confirmed they would be poles apart and not have the easiest time getting on.
“They are entirely different from each other, with different values, drives and realities – they are quite literally on alternate planets.”
DON’T MISS
Meghan Markle news: Why the Duchess of Sussex is now at high risk [INSIGHT]
Meghan Markle update: When will we next see Meghan and baby Archie? [EXPLAINER]
Royal legacy: How Meghan Markle was offered same tribute as Kate [PICTURES]
Meghan, born on August 4, 1981, is a Leo which Ms Frank claims is naturally a royal sign.
Leos have naturally commanding manners and gravitate towards the limelight.
Leo’s world revolves around them being King or Queen with an entourage of helpers assigned to maintain their position.
They thrive on an audience, on attention and appreciation and visibly wilt if they are ever relegated from the starring role.
By comparison, the astrologer claims Kate, born on January 9, 1982, is a “quietly composed Capricorn”.
She said Capricorns are natural rule-followers and adore the structure and monarchy.
Ms Frank added Capricorns feel a strong sense of duty and are extremely hardworking and responsible.
She said: “Kate’s Moon is in Cancer so her twin drives are duty and family and she’s a natural fit for the protocols and demands of her royal role.
“She is happy to be in for the long game as Capricorn prefers hard-earned rewards, whereas fiery Meghan looks for instant applause and results.”
Ms Frank added the pair may have got along well in private, but that they face greater tension being in the public eye.
She said: “In private, Meghan’s Leo warmth might have lit up Kate’s Capricorn coolness.
“Yet Meghan couldn’t get over not having the most prestigious role.
“Perhaps there was an element of the Capricorn cold shoulder freezing her out.
“Very sad, that having landed a truly important position where she could have carved out a fabulous and popular niche for herself, she felt so unappreciated and eclipsed she had to leave.”
Source: Read Full Article